For high-net-worth entrepreneurs, acquiring property abroad has long been about far more than personal preference. International real estate often serves as a strategic building block within a global wealth structure – whether for diversification, asset protection, succession planning or long-term tax optimisation. A particularly common model is to hold overseas properties via foreign companies or holding structures and integrate them into an existing entrepreneurial asset base.
Alongside classic investment criteria such as location, market potential and capital appreciation, tax and structural considerations are increasingly moving to the foreground. For HNWIs, the focus is less on individual assets and more on how international property can be sensibly embedded into a long-term wealth architecture without creating unnecessary risks or tax inefficiencies. However attractive this may look in strategic planning, it brings considerable tax and legal complexity. Unlike purely private purchases, the tax implications do not begin only at letting or sale, but already with structuring, acquisition and ongoing administration. Multiple tax regimes interact, and incorrect assumptions can lead to permanently higher tax burdens.
In cross-border structures in particular, tax effects are often not intuitive. Different national rules can mean that a transaction appears tax-neutral in one state but triggers significant tax consequences in another. Without early planning, risks arise that are difficult – or impossible – to correct later.
This article highlights the key tax aspects for HNWIs, outlines typical scenarios and offers initial guidance on how risks can be identified and managed at an early stage.
One of the central challenges is the simultaneous impact of multiple tax systems: the state of residence, the state where the property is located and – where companies are used – the state in which the relevant structure is established.
While an entrepreneur from Germany may be used to certain basic tax assumptions, abroad there are often entirely different definitions of tax residence, income or deductible costs.
In particular, inserting a company, trust or partnership can produce unexpected tax effects, for example due to CFC rules or differing classifications of income.
In addition, hybrid structures can lead to income being treated as tax-transparent in one state while being treated as opaque in the other. Such classification conflicts carry the risk of double taxation or – in the worst case – a complete denial of foreign tax credits.
A common mistake is to view property purchases in isolation without embedding them into the existing corporate and wealth structure. Especially with larger volumes, this can lead to substantial additional burdens over the long term.
For wealthy entrepreneurs it is therefore crucial not only to analyse the property’s own tax position, but also to consider its interaction with operating companies, holding structures and the private wealth layer.
When purchasing overseas property, some form of transfer tax or property acquisition tax is generally due. Depending on the country, this ranges from a few percentage points to double-digit rates. Notary, registry and local charges are added, and these not uncommonly amount to several per cent of the purchase price. In popular jurisdictions for international investors, additional levies or higher tax rates for non-residents may also apply, further increasing transaction costs and making them a must in any financial appraisal.
Illustrative structuring perspective:
If a German entrepreneur acquires a property via a foreign property company, taxation may arise either at the level of the property or, later, on a share deal, depending on the country. What looks cheaper in the short term can become markedly more expensive on exit or restructuring.
It should also be noted that some states are increasingly bringing share deals within the tax net to prevent avoidance. Any presumed tax saving can therefore disappear entirely.
Practical note:
Before acquisition, it should be assessed whether an asset deal or a share deal fits the overall long-term strategy more effectively.
After acquisition, annual land, property or wealth taxes apply. The tax base is usually determined by official values, which may differ from market value. For HNWIs, it is particularly relevant whether these taxes are deductible at company level and whether they are credited in the country of residence or merely treated as costs. What matters is whether these ongoing taxes are deductible at entity level and how they are treated for tax purposes in the home state. In some cases they affect the overall effective tax rate only indirectly, but they can materially influence the structure’s return.
When overseas properties are let, taxable income arises in the state where the property is situated. HNWIs often let through foreign companies, which changes the tax characterisation. Depending on the structure, taxation may occur at company level, shareholder level or at both levels. A clear delineation of income categories is particularly important here.
Typically deductible items include, among others:
• Depreciation of the building
• Ongoing maintenance and administration
• Financing and interest costs
• Insurance and local fees
Depending on the double taxation treaty, this income is either exempt in the
country of residence or taken into account there with credit for the foreign
tax. Particularly where total income is high, this can increase the
individual’s marginal rate on other income.
Strategic note:
For entrepreneurs with high ongoing income, a clear separation between operating business profits and passive property income can be decisive.
The sale of overseas property is particularly relevant for tax purposes, as significant latent gains are often realised. Many countries tax capital gains regardless of holding period, while others link the tax burden to time limits or specific surcharges. In addition, cross-border situations can trigger withholding taxes or special reporting obligations, which lengthen and increase the cost of the transaction process. Matters become complex where it is not the property itself but shares in a property company that are sold. In such cases, taxation may be triggered both in the state where the property is located and in the state of residence.
Long-term planning:
At the point of acquisition it should already be clear whether an exit is planned later and at which level – property or company – this is intended to take place.
Transferring overseas property as part of succession planning is a key issue. Differing national inheritance and gift taxes can result in assets being taxed multiple times or at unexpectedly high levels. A particular problem is that many states provide no, or only very limited, allowances and levy tax irrespective of degree of kinship. Whereas Germany provides substantial allowances, in many countries there are few or none at all. If a property is held directly, this can create liquidity issues for heirs. Company structures often offer more flexibility here, but they are also tax-sensitive.
Holistic tax and structuring advice
HNWIs should never view overseas property in isolation, but always in the context of their overall structure.
Realistic all-in calculation
Alongside purchase price and return, ongoing taxes, structuring costs and potential exit taxes must be taken into account.
Review financing strategically
Debt financing can make tax sense, but it is not available in every country or to non-residents.
Documentation and compliance
International structures significantly increase documentation and filing obligations. Errors can be costly.
Take a long-term view
Tax frameworks change. Structural flexibility is crucial for HNWIs.
Conclusion
Overseas properties can be an effective building block within an international wealth structure for wealthy entrepreneurs. At the same time, they are among the most tax-demanding asset classes, particularly where multiple countries, entities and types of income interact.
The economic success of such an investment therefore depends less on short-term tax savings and far more on a robust, future-proof structure.
What is decisive for success is therefore not only the purchase price or the location, but the quality of the structuring and long-term planning. Those who involve specialist advice early and consider the entire tax lifecycle of the property can minimise risks and make sustainable use of the benefits of international property investments.
Secure a free initial consultation
